Heir Apparent — Is Gana Gueye’s Successor Already in the Building?
While not a true like-for-like replacement, James Garner's stellar defensive metrics in his break-out season suggest he could be a solution to Idrissa Gueye's inevitable departure
First in the Premier League for successful tackles (120), at least 10 more than any other Premier League player; first for interceptions (59); second for ground duels won (179); in the 97th percentile for defensive contributions; in the 93rd percentile for defensive recoveries; and in the 100th percentile for clearances.
Those impressive defensive statistics sound like peak Idrissa Gana Gueye from either of his spells at Everton but, in particular, his final season with the Blues before he departed for Paris Saint-Germain in 2019.
They belong, however, to his midfield partner, James Garner, who has emerged from 2025/26 as an undisputed bright spot in an otherwise frustrating season, one that promised so much with seven games to go but ended with Everton more or less back where they finished the previous campaign in terms of points and league position.
The 24-year-old came into the season knowing that he needed to finally step out of the shadows and begin showing to Evertonians and the football world at large the kind of footballer he could be. The result was a stand-out campaign for the Blues, the club’s player of the year accolade and a full international cap for England.
Agonisingly, just as Everton fell short at the last, so, too, did “Jimmy” of Thomas Tuchel’s squad for the World Cup this summer. “Gutted” was how Garner expressed it on social media; he must have felt he was in with a chance of being on the plane to North America after the England boss described him as the Three Lions’ “mini-Federico Valverde” after his performance against Uruguay in March.
The comparison was a hugely flattering one given how impressive Valverde had been a fortnight earlier in Real Madrid’s 3-0 win over Manchester City in the Champions League in which he scored all three goals and the similarities don’t end there.
Both players are, ostensibly, box-to-box midfielders but offer versatility in being able to also operate at right back while also being offensive threats and Garner led in the Everton team for chances created (56), for passes (1,793) and expected assists (6.0) while tying Iliman Ndiaye for third for goal involvements.
And yet, there was still a feeling that, in an attacking sense, Everton needed that little more from the man they signed from Manchester United four years ago. He hasn't quite emerged as the creative, goal-producing and goal-scoring attacking midfielder that his loan spell in the Championship with Nottingham Forest suggested he might be.
Much could be explained by the Blues’ overall shortcomings going forward under Moyes and Sean Dyche before him but Garner scored just two goals and his sublime through-ball for Beto in the Toffees’ demolition of Chelsea was as notable for its brilliance as its rarity.
While his defensive numbers are elite in England’s top flight, from an attacking perspective the likes of Elliot Anderson and Adam Wharton probably stand out more among central midfielders. Indeed, Anderson was picked by Tuchel for the World Cup and is being hotly linked with a move to Manchester City this summer.
Over the close season, Everton and David Moyes will be continuing the squad-rebuilding project that began this time last year but there are doubts once more over whether Gueye will extend his stay at the club. The Senegalese failed to make the number of starts that would have triggered the option of adding a further 12-months to the initial one-year deal he signed last summer and he has not yet indicated whether he wants to negotiate fresh terms.
Regardless of whether Gueye stays, there is a strong need for a succession plan to Everton’s long-serving midfield stalwart. He will turn 37 in September, missed the last few games of the season through injury and, for the first time, his performance metrics have started to fall, indicating that age is finally starting to catch up with him.
There has been speculation that Moyes and the transfer committee were targeting a significant central midfield signing this summer and a further slot may open up if Tim Iroegbunam is sold but, given his stellar defensive metrics and his own admission that he sees himself primarily as a No 6, sitting in front of the back four, it could well be that James Garner is the solution to either the phasing out or departure of Idrissa Gueye (who has never identified as a "6" anyway).
Again, the Englishman produced the defensive stats in 2025/26 to support that argument, he is better on the ball than Gueye, has a superior range of passing, a far better shot and can offer a threat from set-pieces — all from defensive midfield if the manager opts to deploy him in a more withdrawn role.
As Paul Traill explored in his article on Gana this time last year, the thought of losing one of Everton’s most effective players of the Premier League era is a daunting one and there was plenty of evidence in the run-in that he was sorely missed as the team saw European qualification slip away as they failed to win any of their matches after that brilliant victory over Chelsea in March.
However, as he advances in years, Gueye’s departure is, sadly, inevitable — if not now then probably in a year’s time. In Garner, the club might not have a true like-for-like replacement and there is a case to be made they need a physical beast in that part of the pitch, but in the context of what still needs to be done in terms of building out the squad, he provides a neat “plug-and-play” option freeing up funds to be spent elsewhere.
Certain statistics credited to EFC Statto
Reader Responses
Selected thoughts from readers07/06/2026 06:25:12
Gyene has the attributes and stats of one of the top Premier League defensive midfielders.Going forward at Everton he was mainly restricted by the players ability around him and having to play long passes forward often losing possession as the formation was not moving forward in support.
But he is a older player now and will be difficult to replace. Garner is good, but has been used as a square pin and a round hole player.Though he has done ok, he is not a replacement for such a specialist type player.Garnerv would be better served in being played in his best position and supported in doing that.
07/06/2026 08:24:31
Jerome and Lyndon, the idea of square pegs in square holes really does apply to Garner. For a player who has really grown, and is now coming into his prime, is it time to make a decision on where his best position is and just leave him there? It may be unfair on the player not to do so. And, if we continue to move him about the pitch, are we risking pushing a quality player out the door?
At twenty four years of age, the time for trialling different positions and figuring out his best one should be over. It's different to squeezing one last season out of a thirty-something player by shoehorning him into a position with less running around.
The same argument is being made about N'Diaye on TW. As a club we cannot afford to alienate what quality we do have.
It's fine if it suits both parties to put a star player up for sale. Even better if there is a replacement lined up. Take the big money, reinvest it in a like for like player and move on. But a player demanding a transfer, or looking to storm out the door in a strop, suits nobody.
07/06/2026 17:49:57
Id like to see Garner as a 6 personally, hes not a box to box midfielder and hes got a good engine and breaks up the play and can pass the ball forward, also Id like to see KDH beside him as an 8 which I think is more natural to him albeit he is a goal threat and has an eye for goal too which weve seen already.
Our team needs a whole rebuild and reshuffle, we always have players playing out of position,
We wont win anything doing that, its so frustrating and so Everton really, firstly, 2 RBs then a CB followed by a striker with a good touch dont worry about all this Hackney talk theyre your priority first. Its not that difficult its called doing the right thing, its sensible and its necessary. Failure to mend these glaring issues will result in a poor start and relegation would be a realistic outcome. Common sense will prevail..wont it?
08/06/2026 08:14:44
It was Steve Walsh who found Gyene and Kante, of Leicester and Chelsea.These type of players are hard to find.When Moshri's largesse was available Kenwright & Co could not keep their noses out of the trough, mucking up Koeman and Walsh's plans.They hid behind the fans as usual and let them take the blame.
Moyes only wants the one type of player.Players like Gyene and Kante he wouldn't even be looking at. If by accident he did they would have to conform to his archaic system.
In his opening months he had Lindtrom a play maker who set up most of the play that lead to goals, and his dream start, which even amazed Moyes.Moyes didn't recognise that, and he was one of the first to go.Then Moyes dumbed down as usual.
08/06/2026 14:57:30
I agree with Harry that the ideal pairing would be Garner at the 6 and KDH at the 8, a position he has already described as his natural one. Armstrong, Iroegbunam and even Rohl would provide depth there.
As I've mentioned before, I suspect our interest in Hackney might be for the #10 position ahead of Garner and KDH, and I'd be 100% behind that.
Add Your Thoughts
Only registered users of Evertonia can participate in discussions.
Or Join as Evertonia Member — it takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your thoughts on artices across the site.


07/06/2026 06:12:19
Lyndon, the last line of the article is hugely important. For me, it is as much about how we manage contracts, the wage bill and value for money as it s about the players themselves.
Gueye would be a top earner. I think that at this stage of his career, the money spent extending his contract would be much better spent on a player like George or Hackney. There would be money left over to go back into the pot for other transfers. With a Wan Bissaka, who would expect higher wages than the two players mentioned, freeing up the Gueye wages would allow us the chance to sign a player that could slot into the starting eleven.
We now have Coleman's wages, a top earner himself, going into the pot. As with Gueye's wages, you could pay two young players what we were paying Coleman. I don't want sentimentality winning out with Gueye in the way it did with Coleman. We have to learn to move players on when it is their time.
I would agree with you that we do also need to properly utilise the players we already have under contract. If Garner is an immediate and quality replacement for Gueye, then just do it. If it means that Rohl, Armstrong, Iroegburam and Alcaraz, all get better opportunities to play, and in their natural positions in midfield, then do it.