Fan ownership: Can it work for Everton?
FAN VIEW
Would the German ownership model have saved Everton? Could it have delivered the clever and difficult financial engineering The Friedkin Group deployed to save our club from ruin?
Correspondent Danny O’Neill sparked an interesting debate in the comments below his recent love letter to Schalke 04 (‘A Look Abroad’, 21st June).
Could the ownership model in German football — a 51:49 split between fans and corporate interests — have offered Everton a route forward, post-Moshiri? Could it have delivered the clever and difficult financial engineering The Friedkin Group deployed to save our club from ruin?
The answer, as you’d expect, is nuanced.
The level, nature and complexity of Everton’s debt structures and obligations when TFG stepped in would tax the grey matter of the brightest lawyers and accountants. With such folk on tap, our new owners instigated a complex financial re-structuring that reduced the club’s debt by £575 million.
Better still, the remaining liabilities — still an eye-watering £468.5 million by the time the work was complete — were placed on a lower-cost footing. A 30-year mortgage for the stadium and a rolling credit facility are said to have saved us £19.2 million per year in debt servicing — enough to buy us Hayden Hackney.
TFG then transferred ownership of our women’s team to a related business within its empire, adding £49.2 million to the men’s club’s coffers.
The cost in terms of legal and financial advice to make all this happen is said to have exceeded £22 million. A rollcall of some of the country’s finest legal minds, including Slaughter and May and Pinsent Masons, have been put to work, notified to the Premier League as part of the club’s reporting obligations.
All very impressive, and just what I’d expect from a multi-billion-dollar corporate entity like TFG. To lean on the Friedkin family’s Texan heritage, our club is certainly not their first rodeo.
The question becomes, could we Evertonians have delivered that ourselves? Could we have engineered the work and funded it to the point that we controlled 51 per cent of its equity?
There’s a ‘yes’ and a ‘no’ here, in my view.
The ‘yes’ comes from knowing plenty of smart Evertonians that run large businesses and who are entirely comfortable with the financial and legal mechanisms at play here. Two of them, Andy Bell and George Downing, stepped forward during the dying embers of Moshiri’s reign with significant financial support and, it is widely understood, a willingness to go further should necessity (or peril) demand it. TFG’s re-organisational approach is meat and drink to two such experienced businessmen.
So that’s settled, then: Evertonians have the organisational ‘smarts’ to pull off a TFG-esque restructuring.Which just leaves the money.
Let’s assume for a moment that a wealthy Evertonian, in a moment of financial largesse, decides to fund 49 per cent of Everton’s debt restructuring to give us mere mortals the opportunity to fund the balance and acquire our 51 per cent controlling stake. Setting aside the likelihood of such generosity, what would that have required of your average Blue?
In short, we’d have had to have stumped up £304.47 million between us all. Bearing in mind that this was pre-Bramley Moore, let us assume all 31,000 season ticket holders and 17,000 official club members at the time agreed to buy into the club.
Done equally, that would have required us to find £6,343.13 each. Not an insurmountable figure, but it would be foolish to assume that we all have that sitting around looking for a home — not to mention partners who’d be happy to see us write the cheque. And with many season ticket holders being pensioners, children and young adults, it’s clear that the burden would fall disproportionately on a smaller number of Blues.
Which means that some several (or even tens) of thousands of those 48,000 would have opted out of taking their full entitlement, requiring a share offer that allowed for a minimum investment and additional shares for those with the readies to invest more. Which is where the uncertainty creeps in. What would happen if the share offer was under-subscribed? How do we sustain the German model whilst clearing the identified debt?
This, of course, is before we get to the trickier issue of subsequent cash calls to fund investment and expansion. You might have six grand to buy your initial shares, but how much do you have left in the family kitty to contribute towards buying a decent striker? And will your other half sign it off every season?If shareholdings can’t be diluted beyond 51 per cent, then we’re back to the club gradually growing its indebtedness — and look where that nearly led us.
You can run a Premier League club at a profit — per Newcastle United during Mike Ashley’s tenure — but to do so requires minimal investment in the transfers needed to satisfy our desire to compete for trophies. As the barcodes learned, therein lies genuine peril: relegation, which they suffered under Ashley for wont of proper investment in the playing side of the business.
Fan ownership clearly works, but only to a point — and it comes with the sort of built-in imbalances that so frustrate us now under the new Squad Cost Ratio. Might it just consign us to a future where the 1980s could never be repeated? After all, in Germany it has resulted in a virtual monopoly, with the wealthiest club dominating proceedings, with Bayern Munich winning 21 of the 30 available domestic trophies in the last ten seasons.Imagine Manchester United, with its shiny new 100,000 seater stadium and larger, wealthier fan base (read ‘shareholder base’), hoovering up trophies at this rate. Or worse, that lot up the hill in Mordor doing likewise.Doesn’t bear thinking about.
I’m going to give our current ownership model — and owners — time to bed in and do their thing. Credit has to be due to them for how they rescued us from the brink and their early work growing our income through commercial deals and exploitation of our stadium. There’s more to come, once concerts come on stream, for example, and as we grow our income, so we can invest more in transfer fees and player wages.
Good on the Germans, Danny, but for better or worse I’ll stick with billionaire owners who might — just might — come good.
Dougal Paver and his teenage children have 3 season tickets in the West Stand.Paver’s first game was a hard-fought 2-0 win against Middlesbrough on 9th September 1978.To no-one’s surprise, Terry Darracott was booked.
Reader Responses
Selected thoughts from readers08/07/2026 07:10:01
I am most certainly a massive advocate of the Germam model of ownership, which is part supporter, part shareholder-owned giving supporters that all-important voice into how the club is run.
They also implement a much fairer system of governance I'm in my opinion. The 51-49 ownership model also prevents one individual, often with an 80% stake, from exercising complete authoritarian, almost dictator-style control over the running of the club.
That said, there are clear and obvious benefits of the current Premier League framework.
What is particularly important is we are finally being run as a stable business. Long overdue after the Bill Kenwright pantomime years.
08/07/2026 09:42:39
To me, this is a much better model for football generally than the Premier League approach of oligarchs, sovereign nations etc for reputation washing and possibly money laundering and sanctions avoidance - and global corporations like, I guess, TFG.
The Premier League is also a disgusting rip off of fans and to be honest not a great spectacle despite the hype. It only gets hyped up as the best to maintain the illusion its worth the money. There are so many boring matches in the Prem - and they try to offset this by skewing the rules (and lets be honest the refereeing) so that the rich clubs who generate most money with global tv audiences get to win. Everyone else is there to make up the numbers.
German club football is exciting and high quality and much better value. Although theres obviously a big issue that Bayern are way, way too dominant.
But unless everyone is required to do it its a non starter.
08/07/2026 22:45:46
Great piece, Dougal,youve nailed the real obstacles. The £304m hurdle, the striker cash calls, the Bayern monopoly argument – all fair points.
But I think youve overlooked a middle ground that isnt pure 50+1 or pure billionaire rule.
Look at Brentford. They dont have fan ownership, but they do have formal fan governance – an elected rep on the board and a proper advisory group with real influence on culture, legacy, pricing, and strategy.It would improve fan connection. Crucially, the owner still writes the cheques and takes the financial risk.
That gives us the best of both worlds: TFGs money plus a genuine seat at the table, without asking thousands of Blues to stump up six grand each. You said youd stick with billionaires who might come good, so would I, provided theyre brave enough to share power, not just host Q&As. Thats the Evertonian compromise Id back.
09/07/2026 07:00:59
Some great observations, gentlemen - thank you. Proof, were it needed, of the complexity of the issues at play.
The point about fan cohesion with regards to strategy is a good one. Instinct says it would be an unhappy co-existence. And with 11 Prem clubs now American-owned, I fear that this year's World Cup may embolden them to really push the boundaries with regards to seat pricing. We all said it wouldn't work, yet the stadiums have been full. One to watch.
Jerome: your middle ground is very appealing, but with possession being nine tenths of the law we're entirely dependent upon an enlightened ownership on that one. After the risks they've taken and the major internal leadership changes (still on-going), would they be prepared to cede a measure of control? We shall see.
Yesterday's release of the Premier League's financial performance for 2024/25 showed the continuing appeal of our great game - but then revealed the financial imbalance our club (and others) struggle to challenge. Commercial income grew 13%, but the Big Six accounted for almost three-quarters of that growth. We must hope that the genuinely smart commercial brains within TFG succeed in righting that imbalance.
09/07/2026 13:30:06
Unfortunately you are right Dougal, but in the New Cognitive Economy the new managerial class governs through procedure; football supporters exercise influence through legitimacy.
Owners may control the assets and executives run the business, but a club's identity belongs to the people who've sustained it across generations. That's why the Evertonian legacy is a power in itself.
Fan power isn't about owning the club—it's about providing the legitimacy that no balance sheet, consultant or boardroom can manufacture.They must be engaged with, not just threated as Customer. They are Consumers, with skin in the game, and have rights to be engaged with in a meaningful way.Never ignored, which is a problem that TFG will have no choice but to deal with.They have already found that out at Roma.
10/07/2026 06:53:21
After the recent article in The Athletic about European football finances, there was a lengthy comment which included the following observation. Be interested to hear if it resonates with anyone more familiar with the Bundesliga model:
“The German system is designed in such a way that it is almost impossible for the most popular team not to win every year, due to the commercial model of Bundesliga economics to be built around fan experience.
“The end result is a sole team winning 13 of the last 14 championships, with no real rival, buying the best players in the league every year and removing the main season long drama of the competition. Ask any German football fan, and they are most likely OK with this, either because they are a Bayern fan (very high probability of this) or because they accept and price into their thinking the consequences of this model.
“In some way, it makes sense the team with the most fans should win every year. This is a complete deal breaker with English fans. English fans moan more, complain about their boards more, have more legal cases, boo more and protest more, but ultimately, they have a proper football product.”
10/07/2026 10:35:37
Lyndon, if ever there was a case for "the grass is always greener.." then I think you get the award. Each long for a better model, each see only the benefits of the other, each perceive the short falls of there own.
So where does it leave us?
Well, I think we are way too far along the capitalistic American investment model to see any meaningful change. Big money investment means greater profile, sorry great money generated, buying the best, huge cash flow. (What about the football, the fans??) Alas the matchgoing fans are always secondary in the PL model, the riches are found in tv rights across the world. If England actually win the WC then it's a huge boon to the Premier league as players will line up to be part of it.
In short it's not going to change soon. We'll not until it either goes bang or something better somewhere else becomes the next big thing.
10/07/2026 12:17:16
It is a interesting article and comments.I wonder how the German model of fan ownership comes about.
Evertonians and other Fans are about providing the legitimacy that no balance sheet, consultant or boardroom can manufacture.
This value cannot be under estimated.FAB was originally set up at Everton in response the Fan lead review and imo to highjack the protest agenda that grew at that time, which did backfire on the Board, because of it's Chairman Jaz, who turned out to be very useful.But since he left has largely been used for press release type of official information and TFG snippets.There is a definite communication gap between TFG and Fans
You would have thought TFG would have learnt from their Roma Experience.
10/07/2026 15:44:19
A genuine question for everyone. Say there is proper year on year progress at Everton under the Friedkin Group. And in five years time we're wheree Villa are now. Five years later, we're a regular top six, with the profile, media attention, narrative and cash rhat goes with it. We'll have the protection of the PL, they'll bend the rules in our favour, and Everton fans are happy with their lit.
What then? Will we still want fan based ownership? Will we still want a seat on the board? Greater say in how the club is run?
My answer if you ask.me would be a resounding no. I'm sick and tired of being a miserable Evertonian. God knows, I've complained enough on here.
Ask Man City fans old enough to remember their club in League one. 115 charges or not, allegations of sports washing or not, allegations of buying your way to success or not. I doubt that many of their fans have walked away.
10/07/2026 19:45:57
If we could just swap the silent friedkins, for the owners of Manchester City, then most if us would be happy Kieran.
10/07/2026 23:19:42
Kieran # 11, I'd be very disappointed if we haven't made the Champions League within 5 years from now. There's every opportunity to do so. As long as the squad is assembled with a view to peaking in, say, 3 to 5 years then we should be very well placed. The thing that will hold us back is buying players now who will be deteriorating fast in 3 years' time. We're not going to get into the Champions League next season (with or without Moyes) so let's build a proper future.
If there's an option this summer to buy 28 year old Wan-Bissaka (£120k pw) on a 5 year deal or 21 year old Rico Lewis ((£25k pw) then it's a no brainer if you want us to get into the Champions League any time soon - go for the younger man with the lower wages. Otherwise you just condemn yourself to mediocrity not just this coming season - but for the next 5 years.
Tony # 12, I am not remotely fussed that the Friedkins keep quiet about their business. Most vocal owners talk utter rubbish (Moshiri certainly did). However, it would be more respectful to the fans if they at least showed up. That said, if we could have City's financial clout I wouldn't say no.
11/07/2026 04:24:53
Dougal, thank you for providing the reality check.
I have always been an admirer of the 50+1 Rule in Germany: look at Dortmund, 60 thousand + gracing their stadium every other weekend, playing in Champions League every year and an astute Front Office that proves "Clubs have to be loss-making to be competitive" as nothing but a lie. How much they paid for a young Haaland and Jude Bellingham, then maximised their time with the club before selling them for healthy profits that replenished the club's coffer: what they have done over the past 20 years have been Textbook materials (Schalke fans nodded their heads grimly in contrast). And they are repeating the trick with Jobe Bellingham!
If we can copy what Dortmund did consistently, then hope for lightning striking once in a fortnight (like what Red Shite Alonso did with Leverkusen's undefeated season), we might just be able to relive our 1980s days.
FYI, TFG is spending USD 3 Billion (GBP 2.2 Billion eq.) to buy an Expansion Team and join the NHL (National Hockey League, one of the 4 Major League Sports in North America) that will be based somewhere in Texas (either Houston or Austin). They certainly have lined up their list of bankers for the financing, but it will be interesting to see how that might affect the operations of Everton and Roma in the next 3 years.
11/07/2026 07:00:38
Kieran#11
By then we will have them knocked into shape.They will have learnt not to fear us.
11/07/2026 08:03:50
DuPont that is exactly right. There is a model to follow already in existence.
It is not become the new Brighton (become a player trading facility but achieve nothing).
It is become the new Dortmund or Leverkusen - which our size and stature and wealth will enable us to do.
It means the big club version of what Brighton do transplanted to the Premier League. Consistent competitive seasons - cup trophies - champions league runs and when the squad peaks and a manager is there to extract that something extra well compete for the title.
They sell players - but they have a model to build it back up again and be ready to go again in two or three seasons.
Interestingly its kind of what the RS were doing successfully until they changed tack and spent nearly £500m last summer - only to find they still had a patchy squad, over reliance on aging players and no British core to carry them.
11/07/2026 10:13:51
Robert#16
That is the only suitable model.Regarding RS it worked for one season with one change under Slot. But having not renewed in his first transfer window and then thinking he could buy experienced professional in his second he floundered.The signs where always there, even when they where Champions by default.Everton are heading in the right direction , but need a different Manager.Slot fell 4 places,Moyes fell 8.
11/07/2026 15:09:00
A couple of points in the German 50 + 1 model.
By paying an annual fee (typically between €30 and €60), fans become voting members who elect the club's president and board of directors. It is estimated that Everton have 400-500,00 fans globally who might want to register for voting rights.
To raise capital for specific projects (such as stadium expansions or new training facilities), clubs frequently issue interest-bearing bonds directly to their supporter base. This allows fans to act as both lenders and owners, borrowing funds at cheap interest rates without losing majority control.
Add Your Thoughts
Only registered users of Evertonia can participate in discussions.
Or Join as Evertonia Member — it takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your thoughts on artices across the site.


08/07/2026 06:31:49
Great article Dougal. It shows the immense figures involved in the PL nowadays. A well ran finacially successful club wouldnt get to the stage where the opportunity for fan ownership would arise. Only one like ours, where the debt was crippling, and the business man owner badly needed out, would be in a position for a fan buyout. As you have shown, the cost for fans is prohibitive.
I think the article shows how sentiment will only get you so far in football. I've mentioned in a previous article that even a wealthy fan turned business man turned owner, such as Jack walker, could no longer operate in today's footballing world. To continually have to pump thousands of your hard earned pounds into your club is not sustainable for your average fan.
Also, while fan group based owners would care about the club dearly, I wonder if it would also deeply divide the fan base. Would groups be constantly be arguing over the direction the club should go in?