I think the “Bargain Bucket CEO” argument is entertaining, but it perhaps lets the real issue off the hook.

Angus Kinnear's salary, the KFC story and comparisons with other chief executives are not, in themselves, particularly relevant to Everton's footballing problems. The real question is much more fundamental:

Who was responsible for the football strategy that produced this squad?

That is where I think the transfer window needs to be examined. For me, this window did not suddenly go wrong in the final few days. The warning signs were already there last summer, when Everton's recruitment appeared to move away from young players with potential towards experienced professionals, largely to accommodate David Moyes.

The problem was that Moyes then largely failed to utilise the young players already at the club. That created a contradiction which this summer was supposed to resolve.

The intention appeared to be to recruit younger players with potential while also putting pressure on Moyes to make better use of the talent already available to him. Instead, we have ended the window with what looks like a seriously imbalanced squad.

We have an oversupply of midfielders, a lack of young attacking talent and an ageing defence. That is not simply a CEO problem. It is a football-operation problem.

And this is where I find the current situation particularly concerning. Everton have reorganised their recruitment structure, yet the end result looks remarkably similar to what we have seen before. One has to ask what that recruitment department has actually been doing and whether the internal cultural battle at the club has hindered the process.

The interviews and press conferences during the window suggested that there was not always a common understanding between the different parts of the football operation about what the squad required.

That matters far more to me than whether Kinnear earns £562,000 or £1.5 million.

The central issue is that the manager, recruitment department and executive structure need to be working towards the same footballing model.At present, I'm not convinced they are.

There is also a tactical problem.

Moyes has a preferred way of playing, but the squad does not appear to contain all the player profiles necessary to make that system work effectively. At the same time, Moyes has never struck me as a manager particularly strong in developing young players, yet Everton's situation increasingly requires exactly that.

So we have young players who need development, a manager who has not demonstrated that this is his greatest strength, and a recruitment strategy that has not supplied enough young attacking talent.

That is the contradiction. And now the consequences have to be managed on the pitch.

Jake O'Brien needs meaningful opportunities in central defence.

Somewhere within this squad, somebody may have to emerge as a central forward. Perhaps a midfielder can make that transition. Perhaps a free agent will have to be found.

But these should not be the desperate solutions of a club that has just completed a carefully planned recruitment process.

They are the consequences of a recruitment process that appears not to have produced the squad it set out to create.

So I don't particularly blame Kinnear for everything that is wrong at Everton. Equally, I don't think he can hide behind the argument that he is merely the messenger.

As CEO, he is part of the leadership structure. If he takes responsibility when things go well, he must also accept responsibility when things go badly. But accountability should extend across the whole football operation — ownership, executive leadership, recruitment and the manager.

That is why I think concentrating on Kinnear's salary misses the bigger picture.

The problem isn't whether Everton have a Bargain Bucket CEO. The problem is that the club appears to have no clear, shared footballing plan — and no convincing evidence that anyone is accountable for delivering one.

Last summer was the warning. This summer was supposed to be the correction.

Instead, the transfer window has exposed a deeper failure: Everton still seem unable to agree on what kind of squad they are trying to build, how that squad should play or who is responsible when the plan falls apart.

That is the conclusion TFG need to confront.

Kinnear's pay packet is only a distraction from the more serious question: who is actually setting Everton's footballing direction, and why has that strategy produced a squad with so many obvious contradictions?

Read More


Reader Responses

Selected thoughts from readers
Certain off-topic comments may be removed to keep the discussion on track

1  Philip Sheehan
07/09/2026    11:25:02

Spot on jerome, a scattergun approach to buying players plenty of cover in midfield 5 0r 6
senior defenders and 1 forward ! like you say jake needs some game time at centre half.
hopefully brannan johnson can convert some chances but don't rotate him with barry -play both of them..go on davey play with 2 forwards ! lets try and win a few games

2  Jerome Shields
08/09/2026    09:56:44

Philip#1

I agree with you regarding Johnson and now Maitland - Niles.It is a long time since Everton played two upfront. Those where better days.I have been trying to get a article together regarding the Friedkins Strategy with Everton, but I am discovering new information daily and the goal posts keep moving.Underdtanding the Strategy that the Friedkins have for Everton is difficult, but they do have one and it appears that Everton is run as a Corporates identity within the Friedkin Group and it part of a Multi Club strategy.I do not like the duming down of football expectations, which they seem to approve off, while pushing forward on Commercial considerations.They take their dividends, raise money with new share offers and look for outside investors.

3  Jerome Shields
08/09/2026    09:56:44

Philip#1

I agree with you regarding Johnson and now Maitland - Niles.It is a long time since Everton played two upfront. Those where better days.I have been trying to get a article together regarding the Friedkins Strategy with Everton, but I am discovering new information daily and the goal posts keep moving.Underdtanding the Strategy that the Friedkins have for Everton is difficult, but they do have one and it appears that Everton is run as a Corporates identity within the Friedkin Group and it part of a Multi Club strategy.I do not like the duming down of football expectations, which they seem to approve off, while pushing forward on Commercial considerations.They take their dividends, raise money with new share offers and look for outside investors.

4  Christine Foster
12/09/2026    11:38:48

Jerome, the Esk's latest breakdown debates whether or not TFG are looking to offload at some point. Frankly I think it's a much simpler observation. They paid circa 300m for the club, plus added investments took it to around 400m, offset by share sales and sales of shares so roughly back to the 300m.. The values of the club, depending on perspective could be around a billion, so the are looking fot a minority invest for let's just say, 300m.. funny that, TFG just about get a clean slate with the opportunity to make a killing with a quick sale or hold tight for another year and watch the values increase without much-needed expenditure. Good old Moyes, job well done, made a silk purse out of a sows ear..
Could really be that simple could it? They don't get involved and get a huge profit if they wanted to sell, or just add huge leverage to their already huge portfolio.

5  Dennis Stevens
12/09/2026    11:51:43

Perhaps Bezos getting connected to those luvable reds has made TFG think they can tempt Musk to make a rival investment.

6  John Collins
12/09/2026    11:55:42

Christine.

The phrase "buying money" comes to mind

7  Jerome Shields
12/09/2026    20:58:36

Christine #4

Christine think your analysis is probably right, but I’d take it one step further.

I’m not convinced TFG necessarily want to sell Everton. They may simply be creating optionality — bring in minority investment, recover a substantial amount of their capital, retain control and let the value of the club grow.

Then they can hold, sell more later, or eventually sell outright.

For me, the key questions are: how much are they raising, at what valuation, and how much control are they giving up?

That may tell us more than the headline “TFG are looking to sell.”

I also think that they still have two things to deal with infrastructure investment and the Ueafa Multi Club regulation breach.They need the latter unravelled for a clean Sale.

By the way Moyes is the ideal Manager for them in this instance , no matter what I think of him .


Add Your Thoughts

Only registered users of Evertonia can participate in discussions.

» Log in now

Or Join as Evertonia Member — it takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your thoughts on artices across the site.